<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash best practice: stage dimension 1000&#215;570</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shang-liang.com/blog/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shang-liang.com/blog/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/</link>
	<description>Life in a Flash</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms C</title>
		<link>http://shang-liang.com/blog/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>ms C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 02:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shang-liang.com/blog/tips/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/#comment-997</guid>
		<description>nice one, thank you! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one, thank you! <img src='http://shang-liang.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://shang-liang.com/blog/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shang-liang.com/blog/tips/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/#comment-641</guid>
		<description>thankyou, this was useful and interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thankyou, this was useful and interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://shang-liang.com/blog/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shang-liang.com/blog/tips/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I like to use the 955 width, because I have found that a number of people, especially IE users will have some side bar open, like the favorites, will browsing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to use the 955 width, because I have found that a number of people, especially IE users will have some side bar open, like the favorites, will browsing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5566</title>
		<link>http://shang-liang.com/blog/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>5566</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shang-liang.com/blog/tips/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To Hugo,&lt;br /&gt;
Dreamweaver came out with that recommendation years ago. Things have changed. Most people have toolbars now, Google or Yahoo!. Although there&#039;s no reliable source of how many percents of browsers have toolbars, but based on the amount of software delivers toolbars as a bundle I think the number should be quite high.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Hugo,<br />
Dreamweaver came out with that recommendation years ago. Things have changed. Most people have toolbars now, Google or Yahoo!. Although there&#8217;s no reliable source of how many percents of browsers have toolbars, but based on the amount of software delivers toolbars as a bundle I think the number should be quite high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Matinho</title>
		<link>http://shang-liang.com/blog/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Matinho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shang-liang.com/blog/tips/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>If you guys check dreamweaver where it says screen resolution you&#039;ll find there 955x600 which acording to adobe is the 1024x768 ( safemargin for all browsers )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you guys check dreamweaver where it says screen resolution you&#8217;ll find there 955&#215;600 which acording to adobe is the 1024&#215;768 ( safemargin for all browsers )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmet</title>
		<link>http://shang-liang.com/blog/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 06:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shang-liang.com/blog/tips/flash-best-practice-stage-dimension-1000x570/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>My favorite is: 971x608

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metah.ch/blog/2006/01/27/target-resolution-safe-area/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proof&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is: 971&#215;608</p>
<p><a href="http://www.metah.ch/blog/2006/01/27/target-resolution-safe-area/" rel="nofollow">Proof</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

